A healthy home is well ventilated; free of pests, toxics, and dangerous gases; dry; clean; comfortable; and affordable. Good construction and maintenance practices can achieve these conditions, even in an older home.

7 Attributes of a Healthy Home

Dry homes minimize moisture and molds. Moisture and molds can trigger asthma attacks and other allergic reactions. Water and moisture also attract cockroaches, rodents, and help dust mites to thrive, all of which can also increase the risk of asthma attacks.

Clean homes have minimal dust and clutter. Researchers and medical experts have proven that dust sensitizes individuals and can trigger asthma attacks. Dust generally comes from two sources:

When it comes to harmful environmental exposures, children cannot be considered “little adults.” Their bodies take in proportionately greater amounts of environmental toxins than adults, their rapid development makes them more vulnerable to environmental interference, and their normal behavior patterns place them at greater risk to some toxins.

Children can be exposed to environmental toxins even before birth if the mother is exposed during pregnancy to toxins that can cross the placenta, such as carbon monoxide or lead. Children’s organs, including the brain, lungs, and reproductive systems, begin developing during the fetal stage and continue to develop through adolescence. Organ growth occurs in spurts, and it is during key growth periods that organ systems are most vulnerable to permanent damage. The Environmental Protection Agency recently acknowledged the enhanced risk to children from environmental exposures when it released draft supplemental guidelines for assessing cancer risk from early-life exposure to carcinogens.

Children are exposed to greater amounts of environmental toxins

IN THIS ISSUE:

• Cleveland Ordinance Establishes New Lead Safety Rules and Incentives for Property Owners
• Jacobs Cleared of Charges, Shuffled Aside
• FDIC Proposal Would Undercut Investments in Low-Income Housing
• Proposed Baltimore Ordinance Would Limit Landlord Liability on Lead Poisoning
• Integrated Pest Management Beats Spraying Against Roaches
• New Asthma Threat Detected in Homes
• New EPA Webpage on Remodeling and Indoor Environmental Quality
• New York City’s Chinese Community Backs Illegal Pesticide Reduction Effort
• NPR Series on Indoor Air and Health
• Research Shows Smoking Creates Harmful Particulate Levels Indoors
• Army Corps Adds Anti-Lead Chemical to DC Water Supply
• New Orleans to Create a Lead Safe House
• EHP Publishes Results of National Center Symposium
• Upcoming Conferences and Trainings
• Correction to Alliance Alert Article: “Federal Lead Hazard Disclosure Law Largely Unenforced in Alabama”
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Cleveland Ordinance Establishes New Lead Safety Rules and Incentives for Property Owners

In the May 27, 2005, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published new national data on lead poisoning (MMWR 54(20); 513-16) (available online at www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4950a3.htm). This report reports various blood lead statistics for 1999 through 2002, the first significant update since the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) data report from 1991 through 1994. These new data document that further gains have been achieved in protecting children from lead poisoning—and that disparities still exist in lead poisoning rates across races and income levels.

New National Data

The report examines new NHANES data collected in 1999-2002. NHANES, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NCHS/CDC), is designed to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States through interviews and direct physical examinations.

The Foundations of Better Lead Screening for Children in Medicaid: Data Systems and Collaboration was developed with the support of The Commonwealth Fund and showcases strategies from five states where intense effort has gone into improving lead screening among the high-risk population of children who are Medicaid beneficiaries. The report’s practical how-to information is of immediate importance to administrators and staff of state Medicaid agencies and state and local health departments, as well as to advocates and policy makers. Among the various topics covered are: combining lead screening data with Medicaid data; state policies that support screening and follow-up care; and using maps to simplify complex information on screening.

Young Medicaid beneficiaries comprise 83% of children in the US with lead levels high enough to require professional follow-up care. Even so, screening among these children remains astonishingly low. In fact, of 42 states reporting Medicaid screening rates for 1999, 25 reported screening fewer than 10% of enrolled children. These rates are even more startling given that a federal requirement for lead screening has been in for nearly a decade.

The Foundations of Better Lead Screening for Children in Medicaid: Data Systems and Collaboration describes promising strategies to improve lead screening for this high-risk group. Free copies can be obtained from the links below or by contacting the Alliance at info@afhh.org or 202-543-1147.

This report can be downloaded entirely in three PDF files:

• Front and Back Covers [PDF]

• Inside Cover, Acknowledgments and Table of Contents [PDF]

• Report Text [PDF]

The Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is fulfilling its commitment to the 2010 goal through its grant program requiring that jurisdictions develop and implement a strategic plan for elimination that includes primary prevention, partnering, and program evaluation.  Through this Building Blocks publication, the Branch now offers grantees and others access to promising approaches, including protective public health policies to reduce lead hazards and other promising strategies.

State and local childhood lead poisoning prevention programs (CLPPPs) universally acknowledge the importance of primary prevention and are beginning to address it in their strategic plans and funding applications.  However, many programs’ primary prevention efforts are confined to parent education about hygiene, nutrition, and housekeeping, despite research that makes clear the limitations of these interventions for families whose homes pose significant hazards.  Inability to institute durable primary prevention is caused in part by the pressure to focus resources and attention on secondary prevention: identifying and managing individual cases of elevated childhood BLL.  Indeed, in communities where follow-up on actual poisonings is limited to educating family members about lead hazards and behavioral change (because public resources are not available to control identified lead hazards and halt further exposure), meaningful primary prevention can seem like an extremely remote target. Programs facing these circumstances need ideas for sharing responsibility within the jurisdiction for stopping repeat offenders, expanding access to lead-safe housing, and ultimately arresting the cycle of inferior housing continually producing new poisonings.

Exposure to several substances found in the home can increase the risk of cancer, which is the second leading cause of death among adults and children in the U.S. According to the American Cancer Society, environmental factors including tobacco, chemicals, infectious diseases, and radiation are responsible for three-quarters of all cancer deaths in the U.S. While many adult cancers can be traced to these environmental factors, the causes of most childhood cancers are unknown. Like many environmentally related diseases, cancer takes a greater toll on African-Americans, who are more likely to develop and die from cancer than persons from other racial and ethnic groups.

According to the American Cancer Society, smoking, unhealthy diet, and physical inactivity play a greater role in determining cancer risk than exposure to trace levels of pollutants in food, air, and drinking water. However, the degree of risk from chemical exposure depends on the concentration and duration of exposure. Individuals exposed to high concentrations of cancer-causing substances bear a significantly higher risk of developing cancer. At the same time, widespread exposure to low concentrations of carcinogens can increase the risk of cancer across the population as a whole. For environmentally related cancers, ten or more years typically pass between exposure to cancer-causing substances and detectable cancer.

Introduction

Although the health of most Americans has improved significantly over time, not all racial and ethnic groups have benefited equally. African-Americans and Hispanics, for example, are more likely than whites to suffer from poor health and to die prematurely. Minority and low-income families are more likely to live in substandard housing and polluted communities, increasing their risk of childhood lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and other environmentally related diseases. In addition to being disproportionately affected by disease, minorities often lack adequate insurance and access to health care due to financial and cultural barriers.

To a large extent, disparities in health and access to care among minorities reflect disparities in socioeconomic status. In fact, according to the Health Resources and Services Administration, the connection between socioeconomic status and health disparities is so strong that income and education levels often serve as proxies for health status. The fact that minority populations on average are poorer than whites underlies many health disparities.

Insurance Coverage and Access to Health Care

Good property maintenance is the foundation for ensuring healthy housing conditions. If hazards do develop, a range of strategies are available to remediate specific housing-related health hazards.

Many homes fall short of the basic requirements of a healthy home and contain one or more hazards that adversely affect human health. Among the health hazards we may encounter in our homes are those that cause and contribute to asthma (such as dust allergens, mold, and pests), toxic materials (such as lead, asbestos, and chemical pesticides), and poisonous gases (such as carbon monoxide and radon).