[ Print Version ]

February 2004

IN THIS ISSUE:

FY04 Budget Passes; Budget Cuts Proposed for FY05

After a long wait, the federal FY2004 Omnibus Appropriations bill was passed and signed into law late last month. The bill wrapped up a drawn-out fiscal process and included appropriations for HUD, CDC, and EPA, along with many other agencies.

Funding levels for HUD’s Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control programs were not increased for FY04, with the overall total for lead hazard reduction funded at $174 million. Operation LEAP was funded at $9 million, the High Lead Areas Removal Initiative remained at about $50 million, and the Healthy Homes program retained its $10 million funding level. The bill also included level funding for EPA and CDC lead poisoning prevention programs, restoring the proposed cut in EPA grants for state lead poisoning prevention programs. In the final analysis, Congress provided full funding for the Housing Choice Voucher rental assistance program for low-income families.

On Feb. 1, the Bush Administration submitted its FY2005 budget request to Congress, the first step in the next annual budget process. The President’s budget proposes a 20% cut in lead hazard reduction from $174 million to $139 million. The proposed total includes $10 million for Healthy Homes and $9 million for Operation LEAP but zeros out the $50 million lead hazard control grants targeted to cities with the worst lead poisoning problems. The Administration’s decision to cap domestic program funding increases at 0.5% (exclusive of homeland security) has forced reductions in many programs. Overall funding for affordable housing and community development is essentially flat, but the President’s request falls short of funding all housing vouchers that are currently authorized. Moreover, the Administration has once again proposed changing housing vouchers into a block grant program and eliminating HOPE VI, two policy changes that Congress rejected last year.

Other agencies’ lead and healthy homes programs also saw generally flat funding in the FY05 proposal, though there were increases and some cuts compared with the president’s FY04 request. EPA’s lead grant program funding is level with the previous year’s, but its Lead Risk Reduction Program loses $3.75 million in the proposal; at the same time, some of EPA’s indoor air quality programs received slightly increased amounts. CDC saw a level budget request for its environmental health programs, which include childhood lead poisoning prevention and asthma initiatives.

High Lead Levels Discovered in DC Water

A major controversy is raging in Washington, DC about elevated lead levels in drinking water. As the Washington Post recently reported, more than 4,000 of 6,000 homes tested exceeded the EPA standard of 15 parts per billion of lead in drinking water, and many homes had extremely high levels (300 ppb and above). The municipal water company was apparently very lax in reporting the results to residents and fired a "whistleblower" who informed the U.S. EPA of the problem. Further details on this developing story can be found at www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14068-2004Feb4.html. You can follow the links in the box on the right-hand side of the page for more background on the controversy.

Should there be concern about lead in drinking water in your community, various options are available for testing drinking water for lead: some utilities offer free tests for residents; most environmental laboratories perform such tests; and home test kits are available. The low-cost home test kit that the Alliance’s Community Environmental Health Resource Center uses provides an immediate screen for pesticides and bacteria as well as lead. For more information visit www.cehrc.org/tools/lead/leadwater/index.cfm.

New Jersey Passes Lead Hazard Control Bill

On Jan. 12, the New Jersey Legislature passed the Lead Hazard Control Assistance Act, which was signed into law by Governor Jim McGreevey Jan. 20. Various versions of this bill had been introduced regularly since 1994, but never previously made it to floor votes in both houses.

Several factors made all the difference for the bill this time around. New Jersey Citizen Action (NJCA), a coalition of 120 state and local organizations, worked with the New Jersey Tenants Organization, the Patterson Task Force, and the New Jersey Environmental Federation in negotiations with State Assembly Democrats, asking the Assembly to pass a bill identical to the Senate’s version. NJCA also asked individuals to write to the Assembly’s leadership, requesting that the Assembly pass the bill as written. These efforts helped avoid a messy back-and-forth exchange between the Assembly and Senate; in New Jersey, a bill must pass both houses in identical format before being sent to the governor.

The bill creates a $10 million annual fund to evaluate lead-based paint hazards in low-income housing and offers low-interest loans and grants for abatement projects. The bill creates a separate fund to help relocate lead-poisoned children and establishes a registry of lead-safe housing. The bill also mandates lead inspections for rental properties constructed before 1978 with three or more housing units, unless they are certified as being free of lead-based paint. Inspections will occur in five-year cycles, and the $20 fee per unit inspected will go into the relocation fund.

In 2002, more than 5,000 children tested in New Jersey had elevated blood lead levels, and the effects of lead poisoning cost the state millions of dollars each year in health care and special education expenses.

The bill may be found at www.njleg.state.nj.us/2002/Bills/S1500/1348_R3.HTM, or www.njleg.state.nj.us/2002/Bills/S1500/1348_R3.PDF (PDF version).

Victory on NYC Lead Poisoning Prevention Law

On Feb. 4, the New York City Council reaffirmed its strong support for a tough new lead-hazard control law, overriding Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s veto by a resounding vote of 44-5-1. The measure will go into effect in six months.

The law, drafted by advocates and introduced several years ago, replaces the city's 1980s-era law that was reinstated briefly after a 1999 law was invalidated last July by the state’s highest court. The new statute requires landlords to safely remove peeling lead paint and lead dust in pre-1960 apartments where children under age 7 reside. Cited violations must be fixed within 45 days, and the city must inspect landlords’ repairs within 14 days. The law also mandates that landlords identify all children under age 7 living in rental properties constructed before 1960 and provides strict lead-safe work practice standards for paint repair.

Arguing that the new law will be costly and difficult to implement, Bloomberg’s administration immediately denounced the council’s action, saying the measure will not protect children and will drive away those developers willing to construct low-income housing. Supporters of the new law rebuffed these claims, stating it is well within the city’s ability to provide affordable, lead-safe housing for all of New York City’s families.

For more information on the work of local advocates to pass the law and to help the Council override Mayor Bloomberg’s veto, contact Matthew Chachère, Northern Manhattan Improvement Corporation, chachere@igc.org.

Mold Exposure Linked to Childhood Asthma Risk

A recent study funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences found that indoor mold exposure increased the incidence in infants of two important precursors to childhood asthma: wheezing and persistent cough. The study included 849 infants delivered in five hospitals, all of whom had at least one sibling diagnosed with childhood asthma.

The study, conducted in Connecticut and southern Massachusetts, studied a wide range of factors that can impact indoor air quality, including allergens, tobacco smoke, wood smoke, and mold. It found that while common allergens did not significantly impact the respiratory health of the infants in the study, mold did trigger greater rates of wheezing and persistent coughing in babies. The study also demonstrated that infants whose mothers have asthma are at a greater risk of adverse health effects from exposure to mold than infants whose mothers do not have asthma, suggesting that mold sensitivity may be genetic. The study’s authors recommend further inquiries to examine the interaction between possible genetic factors and mold exposure in infants.

The study, “Symptoms of Wheeze and Persistent Cough in the First Year of Life: Associations with Indoor Allergens, Air Contamination, and Maternal History of Asthma,” was published in the August 1, 2003 issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology and was summarized in the January 2004 issue of Environmental Health Perspectives. The summary is available online at http://ehis.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2004/112-1/niehsnews.html (bottom of the page) or http://ehis.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2004/112-1/EHP112pa28PDF.PDF (PDF version, p. 4).

Chicago and NJ Proceed with Litigation against Lead Paint Manufacturers

More than twenty public entities in New Jersey, including Newark and Union County, have filed an appeal to continue their litigation against the manufacturers of lead-based paint. The plaintiffs are appealing the November 2002 dismissal of their case. The cities and counties filed several suits against the lead industry in 2001 on grounds of fraud, public nuisance, conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and indemnity; those cases were then consolidated in the Mass Tort Section of state courts. The Alliance, the American Public Health Association, New Jersey Citizen Action, the Association for the Children of New Jersey, and the NJ Statewide Parent Advocacy Network filed an amici curiae brief in support of the plaintiffs' appeal.

The City of Chicago has also just filed an appeal in its case. On Sept. 5, 2002, the City of Chicago launched the largest case filed to date against lead pigment manufacturers for damages stemming from lead-based paint. Chicago has more lead-poisoned children than any city in the country and almost any state. On Oct. 7, 2003, a judge dismissed the city’s lawsuit, ruling that the city failed to connect any of the defendants to a nuisance in any particular building. The Alliance, American Public Health Association, Day Care Action Council of Illinois, Health & Disability Advocates, Illinois Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Infant Welfare Society of Chicago, Illinois Public Health Association, Metropolitan Tenants Organization, Lawyers Committee for Better Housing, Uptown People’s Law Center, and Voices for Illinois Children filed an amici curiae brief in support of the city's appeal.

Review Period Open for EPA Indoor Air Quality Label Proposal

The public review period for the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) label is now open. EPA’s Indoor Environments Division has released information and draft materials to invite comments on the concept of developing an IAQ label in concert with the Energy Star new homes program (www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=new_homes.hm_index).

The proposed plan would offer newly constructed homes that meet specific indoor air quality criteria an IAQ label very much like the Energy Star label already in existence. The draft specifications have been posted on EPA’s website, and comments are being solicited from all interested organizations and individuals. The comment period closes Friday, March 12, 2004.

To access the draft and submit comments on the proposal, please visit www.epa.gov/iaq/energystar/label_specifications.html.

Upcoming Conferences

The Western Regional Conference on Mold, Lead, and Healthy Homes and Children’s Environmental Health will be held from March 31 to April 2 in Berkeley, California. Subject matter will cover children’s environmental health; health education; lead hazard control and healthy homes practices, programs, and policies; and conducting mold prevention, assessment, and remediation work. Registration by February 29 is $360, and partial scholarships are available for qualifying individuals. For more information about the conference, see www.leadconferences.com/04pdfs/2004WesternRegConf.pdf. Further details can be obtained by visiting www.leadmoldconferences.com or by calling 1-800-590-6522.

The 22nd National Pesticide Forum, entitled “Unite for Change: New Approaches to Pesticides and Environmental Health,” will take place from April 2-4 at the Clark Kerr Conference Center at the University of California, Berkeley. Topics to be covered include home contamination, emerging pesticide science, successful grassroots campaigns, corporate accountability, pesticides in schools, stopping pesticide drift, social marketing, litigation for change, and more. Details about the conference and the preliminary agenda can be found at www.beyondpesticides.org/forum/brochure.pdf. Questions can be directed to Beyond Pesticides at 202-543-5450.

The 4th National Asthma Conference: “Winning with Asthma” will be held in Atlanta from April 14-16. The conference, sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and co-sponsored by the American Lung Association, will cover a variety of topics related to asthma, including coalition building, asthma surveillance, asthma interventions, asthma policy and legislation, and health system change. Online registration is $75; on-site registration will be $100. For details, visit the conference website at www.signup4.net/Public/ap.aspx?EID=200414E. For questions about the conference or if you cannot register on the Internet, please call Laura McMahon of Visions USA, Inc. at 404-320-1818 ext. 248.

The National Low Income Housing Coalition’s Annual Housing Policy Conference and Lobby Day is coming up on April 26 and 27. The conference will be held in Washington, DC, and will consist of several sessions, on low-income housing as an election issue, the National Housing Trust Fund, and other current housing issues. There will also be a leadership awards reception the evening of the 27th. For more information, visit www.nlihc.org or call 202-662-1530.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter, send an e-mail (afhh@afhh.org) or fax (202-543-4466) with "Subscribe" or "Unsubscribe" in the subject line. If you received this issue of the Alliance Alert via fax, please send us your e-mail address for faster delivery and to conserve resources. Thank you!