[ Print Version ]
November 2006

IN THIS ISSUE:

Three Members of Congress Join Lawsuit Against EPA Pesticide Testing Rule

Senators Bill Nelson (D-FL) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA), and Representative Hilda Solis (D-CA) joined a lawsuit filed against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over a recently issued rule restricting pesticide tests on children and pregnant women. The lawsuit was filed earlier this year by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

NRDC and the Congressional members assert that the new rule fails to implement a total ban on testing pesticides on vulnerable populations, required by legislation signed into law in 2005. The legislation was drafted in response to a proposed pesticide study in Duval County, FL, that would have provided low-income families compensation for allowing their children’s continued exposure to pesticides. The proposed study was funded in part by the American Chemistry Council.

The lawmakers assert that there are significant loopholes in EPA’s human testing rule. Nelson remarked, “Pregnant women, infants, and children have been and likely still will be used as human guinea pigs in pesticide testing. It must be stopped.” NRDC added that the rule as written will continue to allow such tests as long as pesticide companies don’t submit the results as part of their application for pesticide registration.

EPA disputed the claims, with Agency spokesperson Jennifer Wood saying that EPA always works to ensure the health and safety of pregnant women and children, among other vulnerable populations.

For more information on the dangers of pesticides in the home and how to reduce pesticide exposure, visit www.afhh.org/hhe/hhe_pesticides.htm and www.afhh.org/dah/dah_pesticides.htm.

Akron Joins Other Ohio Cities in Suing Former Lead Pigment Makers

On October 12, the City of Akron became the third Ohio municipality to file a lawsuit against several former lead pigment manufacturers. Like East Cleveland and Toledo, which filed suits in late September, Akron cited the large number of homes within its city limits that contain lead-based paint.

Akron’s lawsuit seeks, among other things, removal of lead paint from public and private buildings; damages to cover the millions of dollars the city has already spent cleaning up lead-based paint hazards; and funds for a childhood lead poisoning prevention education program.

John McConnell, Jr., an attorney with the law firm Motley Rice, which is representing the city, said, “Akron’s lead paint poisoning problem is among the worst in the state of Ohio.”

The former pigment manufacturers were quick to respond, led by Cleveland-based Sherwin-Williams Co., which claimed the Akron suit and others like it in Ohio “do not have a lot of merit.” Company spokesperson Bob Wells added, “Ohio is the last place we thought cities would bite their own.”

In addition to Sherwin-Williams, the Akron suit names Millenium Holdings, NL Industries (formerly National Lead), ConAgra Grocery Product Company, Du Pont, Atlantic Richfield, Cytec Industries, and American Cyanamid. The same companies may be subject to still more suits in the near future, as the cities of Columbus and Cincinnati are considering similar litigation.

California Enacts Law Reducing Lead in Plumbing Fixtures

In late September, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) signed a new law that will reduce the amount of lead allowed in plumbing fixtures and water lines in the home. Assemblyperson Wilma Chan (D-Alameda) proposed the bill, AB 1953.

The law takes effect in January 2010 and sharply reduces lead content in all plumbing fixtures from the current maximum of eight percent to a maximum of 0.25 percent. Currently, the U.S. EPA allows plumbing fixtures to be sold under a “lead-free” label, even if they contain up to eight percent lead content.

Upon signing the bill, Governor Schwarzenegger commented, “I signed this bill to reduce the amount of lead exposure in California’s drinking water. We need to make sure that the water we consume is safe for everyone, especially our children.”

Environmental groups, public health officials, and local and regional water districts supported AB 1953. The California Building Industry Association opposed the new safety standards included in bill and were joined by plumbing fixture manufacturers.

For more information about lead and the dangers it poses, visit www.afhh.org/lead.

EPA Issues Final Air Quality Criteria for Lead Emissions

On September 29, EPA issued its final updated air quality criteria document (AQCD) for lead emissions. This is the first time that EPA has updated the lead AQCD since 1990. The document was issued as part of an overall review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for lead. The review is long overdue, as federal law requires a review of all NAAQSs every five years, and EPA last updated the NAAQS for lead in 1978. The old standard is based on an “acceptable” blood lead level of 30 µg/dL, three times the current action level set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The AQCD forms the scientific basis for continued review of the lead standard for ambient air. Despite protests from the lead industry, EPA stressed throughout the updated AQCD the detrimental public health impacts of blood lead levels at and below 10 µg/dL. While the AQCD does not make any explicit recommendations to the EPA Administrator regarding the blood lead level on which to base any updated ambient air standard, the document is normally considered very influential in setting emissions policy.

The next step in the NAAQS review process is for EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) to prepare a "staff paper" that "bridges the gap" between scientific assessments in the criteria document and judgments required of the EPA Administrator in evaluating whether to retain or revise the lead NAAQS.

For the complete text of the AQCD and related information, visit http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=158823.

Alliance Continues Healthy Homes Rebuilding Efforts in Gulf Coast Region

The Alliance for Healthy Homes is continuing its important healthy homes rebuilding efforts in the Gulf Coast region. In October, the Alliance co-sponsored with the Preservation Resource Center of New Orleans a two-hour workshop on the safe and effective cleanup of moldy homes for property owners. The workshop presented methods for homeowners to appropriately remediate mold in historic buildings. The workshop teaches how to maximize the preservation of original building components that generally withstand water intrusion better than new replacement components. During the same month, the Alliance co-sponsored with the Preservation Trades Network a roundtable discussion with about 50 experts on rebuilding regarding affordable, safe, and healthy rebuilding strategies for hurricane-damaged homes.

In November, the Alliance will co-sponsor its third train-the-trainer workshop, designed for staff and volunteers from New Orleans-area organizations working with homeowners, volunteers, day laborers, contractors, and other workers on post-hurricane home cleanup. The first two train-the-trainer sessions, in April and June, were well attended.

Noted healthy homes expert Dennis Livingston has been the Alliance’s trainer and discussion leader for these healthy homes rebuilding events, with valuable assistance from organizations such as the National Center for Healthy Housing, Louisiana State University’s AgCenter, Moving Forward Gulf Coast, Preservation Resource Center, the Preservation Trades Network, and local Sierra Club chapters.

North Carolina Holds First Statewide Healthy Homes Meeting

The Greensboro Housing Coalition, the North Carolina Housing Coalition, the Alliance for Healthy Homes, and other partners brought a diverse group of stakeholders together September 18 and 19 for North Carolina’s first statewide healthy homes meeting.

The purpose of the meeting, one of several state and local healthy homes meetings across the country being organized by the Alliance and local partners, was to start to build a movement for healthy homes at the stare level by bringing together a wide variety of stakeholders in the areas of health, housing, energy, environment, and green building to form partnerships and plans that promote healthy homes in North Carolina. A secondary purpose was to gather input from participants that will inform the agenda of an eventual national healthy homes summit.

Nearly 100 representatives from communities across the state shared information about their accomplishments and partnerships, goals, and challenges. Through local collaborations of universities, cities and counties, health departments, nonprofit advocacy and housing development organizations, and housing authorities, North Carolina advocates are making progress towards healthy homes, despite the challenges of language barriers, high land prices, abandoned properties, funding shortages, and constituencies that move frequently.

Work groups at the meetings discussed a number of issues critical to advancing healthy homes in North Carolina, including housing-related health hazards, design construction and rehab for healthy homes, code enforcement for healthy homes, and healthy housing affordability.

To integrate lessons learned and build consensus for joint action, the attendees wrote action steps and collected these into several categories, including public policy initiatives; asset preservation; needs assessment; money issues; interagency coordination and collaboration; training; regulations, standards and enforcement; and education. Next steps include Local Initiatives Support Corporation sponsoring statewide green building training for community development corporations and community-based organizations; the North Carolina Housing Coalition coordinating statewide healthy homes policy initiatives; and working to fund and carry out a study to examine the cost of unhealthy housing and quantify the savings achievable by making homes healthier.

For more information on the outcomes of the North Carolina meeting, contact Beth McKee-Huger at 336-691-9521 or rachelltv@aol.com.

Scientists Resign from EPA Advisory Panel on Toxins

Three members of a federal science advisory panel on toxic pollution prevention resigned in October, citing excessive industry influence over the board's agenda. Richard Denison, senior scientist for Environmental Defense; Joseph Guth, executive director of the California League for Environmental Enforcement Now; and Joel Tickner, assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts, resigned from EPA’s National Pollution Prevention & Toxics Advisory Committee, which is charged with reviewing the agency's assessment and management of chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act.

The three scientists said the seven industry representatives on the 15-member panel have limited its agenda to "narrow, short-term issues" that do not warrant the time or expense to EPA. The panel includes representatives from Dow, Procter & Gamble, the American Chemistry Council, and the American Petroleum Institute.

EPA had no comment on the resignations.

Childhood Lead Exposure May Increase Adolescent Injury Risk

New findings published in the October 2006 issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health suggest that children exposed to high levels of lead early in life may be at greater risk of falls and injuries than their peers who were not poisoned by lead.

Researchers believe that lead exposure can affect children’s long-term risk of injury by harming their sense of balance, coordination, and other neuromuscular skills, doing so as it damages brain tissue and other parts of the central nervous system. Recent research findings of links between lead and ADHD, as well as poor attention and impulse control, may also partly explain why teenagers exposed to lead in childhood are more prone to injuries.

Specifically, the study found that teenagers with higher lead levels as young children were at greater risk of injury from falls or loss of balance, and adolescents who sustained injuries that limited their activities for four or more days had an average childhood blood lead level of 15.7 ug/dL. Overall, those teenagers who sustained any injuries at all had higher childhood blood lead levels than their peers who reported no injuries during their teenage years.

The study’s authors said that though their research methods were sound, the results should still be considered preliminary, as this was the first study of its kind. The scientists called for further research into the association between elevated blood lead levels and teenagers’ injury risks.

An abstract of the study is available at www.jahonline.org/article/PIIS1054139X06000589/abstract?browse_volume=39&issue_key=TOC%40%40JOURNALS%40JAH%400039%400004&issue_preview=no&select1=no&select1=no&vol= or http://tinyurl.com/yyyn6w.

Scientific Study Documents Brain Organization Impacts of Lead

An article published in the September 2006 issue of Pediatrics documents possibly harmful impacts of lead on childhood brain organization. Specifically, the article’s authors studied whether lead interferes with the organization of sections of the brain that control language functions.

After examining images from magnetic resonance image scanning (MRI), the researchers discovered that children with higher blood lead levels had significant differences in sections of the brain that are involved in learning and using language effectively and correctly. These areas suffered “diminished activation” in children with higher blood lead levels as compared to children with little or no lead in their blood. These impacts occurred in the left side of the brain, but they had the indirect effect of prompting enhanced activation in the right side of the brain.

The results of the study led the scientists to conclude that childhood lead exposure has significant impacts on brain reorganization as associated with language function, and that these effects are persistent.

The abstract of the study can be found at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/short/118/3/971.

Alliance and LISC Healthy Homes Web Conference Archive Now Online

The Alliance for Healthy Homes, in partnership with the Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC), sponsored a healthy buildings web conference on October 12. The conference examined housing-related health hazards ranging from lead to mold and explored how to create communities with healthy homes. Featured experts included staff from ERT Associates, an environmental and health policy consultancy, and Urban Edge, a community development corporation working in Jamaica Plain, Roxbury, and surrounding communities in Massachusetts. Bob Zdenek, Executive Director of the Alliance, led a discussion on: primary prevention, practical solutions, environmental justice, and "whole house" strategies that address multiple hazards and their underlying causes. The archive of the web conference is available online at www.lisc.org/content/calendar/detail/3387/.

National Center for Healthy Housing Launches Updated Healthy Housing Research Clearinghouse

Looking for research on the efficacy of asthma interventions in the home? How about information related to preventing damp basements? The National Center for Healthy Housing (NCHH) has created a comprehensive database of peer-reviewed research and guidance documents related to healthy homes issues through the National Healthy Housing Clearinghouse. The Clearinghouse, which is funded through a cooperative agreement from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is intended to provide researchers, policymakers, and program staff easy access to the latest research on housing and health issues. The site contains more than 600 documents and is updated monthly. The information is useful for writing presentations, grant proposals, and reports that need to document the evidence connecting housing conditions to specific disease outcomes; learning best practices for housing professionals (e.g. construction, rehabilitation, maintenance practices) and health professionals (e.g. environmental disease management, resident education programs, and home visits); and more.

Where the publisher has granted permission, the full text articles are available. Where such permission has not been granted, the Clearinghouse provides a full citation and abstract as well as a link to the publisher so that you can access the information.

To visit the Clearinghouse, go to www.healthyhousing.org/clearinghouse.

HUD Announces FY06 Lead and Healthy Homes Grantees

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced in late September grant awards totaling more than $118 million to dozens of state and local communities, public health organizations, and scientific research institutions to better protect children and families from lead-based paint and other home health and safety hazards.

Another $39 million in funding will be awarded late this year or early next year to help clean up lead hazards in communities with the greatest need, specifically cities with a high incidence of lead poisoning and older homes.

For a full list of FY06 lead hazard control and healthy homes grantees and their project summaries, visit www.hud.gov/content/releases/pr06-118.pdf.

EPA Seeks Public Comment on Its Draft Child Exposures Handbook

The EPA National Center for Environmental Assessment opened a 60-day comment period on October 6 for its summary handbook of statistical data on various exposure factors used in assessing children's exposures. The handbook will serve as a resource for assessors for calculating children's exposures. Comments are due by December 5. Information on how to review the handbook and submit comments is available at www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-RESEARCH/2006/October/Day-06/r16573.htm.

New EPA Resource to Help Assess Children’s Health Risks

As a part of EPA’s efforts to address children’s health issues, the Agency’s research and development office has written a report—A Framework for Assessing Health Risks of Environmental Exposures to Children—that can serve as an important resource on children’s health risk assessment. This peer-reviewed report provides a comprehensive and consistent framework for considering children in risk assessments at EPA. This Framework is not an Agency guideline, but rather describes the overall structure and the components considered important for children’s health risk assessment.

The Framework can be found on the National Center for Environmental Assessment’s website at www.epa.gov/ncea, under Recent Additions.

Alliance Earns “Best in America” Seal of Approval

The Alliance for Healthy Homes was recently awarded the "Best in America" seal from the Independent Charities of America (ICA). The seal indicates that ICA considers the Alliance one of the best charities in America and ensures donors to the Alliance that their funds will be used effectively.

According to the ICA, “The ICA Seal is awarded to the members of ICA and the Local Independent Charities of America that have, upon rigorous independent review, been able to certify, document, and demonstrate on an annual basis that they meet the highest standards of public accountability, program effectiveness, and cost effectiveness. These standards include those required by the U.S. Government for inclusion in the Combined Federal Campaign, probably the most exclusive fund drive in the world. Of the 1,000,000 charities operating in the United States today, it is estimated that fewer than 50,000, or five percent, meet or exceed these standards, and, of those, fewer than 2,000, or 0.2 percent, have been awarded this Seal."

Those interested in contributing to the Alliance can visit www.afhh.org/misc/misc_contrib.htm to donate via credit card online or may donate via check through the U.S. Mail.

Alliance Participating in 2006 Combined Federal Campaign

The 2006 Combined Federal Campaign (CFC), which started in September and runs through the end of December, is the federal government’s workplace charitable giving program. Federal employees who wish to give to the Alliance through the CFC can do so by using organization code 1503. Thank you for your support!

Funding Opportunities

EPA Region 6 is soliciting applications from eligible entities to conduct projects in the following areas: 1) Education of asthmatics and their parents and/or primary care givers concerning environmental triggers through home, daycare, community, and school interventions; 2) Training of healthcare professionals, community workers, and other trained individuals on environmental management of asthma so they can counsel people with asthma; 3) Educating parents and care givers on children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke through home, daycare, and community interventions; and 4) Outreach and training projects that result in effective Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) management practices in schools. The application deadline is November 27, 2006. For all the details, visit www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6pd/iaq/iaq_rfp.pdf.

EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs, in coordination with the EPA Regional Offices, has announced the availability of up to an estimated $509,000 in FY2007 State and Tribal Assistance Grant monies to further the pesticide risk reduction goals of the Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program. The Agency anticipates funding approximately ten projects, one per EPA Region, with a maximum funding level of approximately $50,900 per project. Eligible applicants include the 50 States, District of Columbia, U.S. Virgin Islands, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, any agency or instrumentality of a state including state universities, and all federally recognized tribes. Proposed projects must address implementation of integrated pest management approaches that reduce the risks associated with pesticide use in agricultural or non-agricultural settings. Proposals are due to the agency January 12, 2007. For more information, visit www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/PESP/regional_grants/2007announcement.htm.

Upcoming Conferences

The 2006 Environmental Public Health Conference, presented by Centers for Disease Control's National Center for Environmental Health, will be held in Atlanta, December 4-6. The conference theme is "Advancing Environmental Public Health: Science, Practice, New Frontiers." Among the panels will be an Alliance-led session on innovative strategies for the primary prevention of lead poisoning, and a session on public health concerns surrounding rebuilding after natural disasters. Alliance staff will also moderate a panel on public health law and its role in providing healthy homes and healthy communities. and For more information, see www.cdc.gov/nceh/conference/index.htm.

The University of California—San Francisco – Collaborative on Health and the Environment Summit on Environmental Challenges to Reproductive Health and Fertility will be presented January 28-30, 2007, in San Francisco. The Summit will provide overviews by leading researchers of the science on environmental contaminant impacts on male and female reproductive health and fertility, developmental health, and peri-conceptional and fetal origins of adult disorders. The Summit will also explore critical research directions and tools; translation of the research to public health policy; integration with health professional education; federal government environmental reproductive health priorities; patient advocate and community health concerns; and translation of research to clinical disorders. For more information, visit www.ucsf.edu/coe/prhesummit.html.

The 7th National Conference on Science, Policy, and the Environment: Integrating Environmental and Human Health will be held February 1-2, 2007, in Washington, DC. The conference will explore the linkages between environment and human health and will address the many essential roles the environment plays on our well being today, as well as the multi-dimensional relationships between human health and environmental components, which may have far-reaching consequences. For more information, see www.ncseonline.org/2007conference/cms.cfm?id=1238.

The 6th Annual New Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy and Livable Communities Conference will be held in Los Angeles, February 8-10, 2007. The conference hosts a variety of participants and speakers who cross disciplines to share experiences and insights, and valuable tools and strategies to encourage smart growth implementation. Public health is one important discipline that has begun to recognize smart growth as a viable solution to improve our nation’s health. To view more information on this conference, visit www.newpartners.org.

The International Conference on Developmental Toxicity and Fetal Programming will take place
May 20-24, 2007, in Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (located in the North Atlantic). This international conference emphasizes a) the developmental perspective, i.e., the risks during different developmental stages, from preconception to adolescence, from toxic substances; b) the environmental perspective, i.e., the impacts of different environmental hazards; and c) the disease perspective, i.e., long-term health implications. For further information, please visit www.pptox.dk.

Upcoming Trainings

Building Science Corporation is offering its two-day advanced building science course through the end of 2006 in locations throughout the country. Topics covered will include rain control, air control and ventilation, heat and moisture movement, green building, and disaster resistance. Each course module (14 in all) is the subject of a Building Science Digest that will be freely available online several weeks prior to each listed course. Courses will be taught November 28-29 in Orlando, December 12-13 in Seattle, and December 19-20 in Minneapolis. For more details, visit www.buildingscienceseminars.com/.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter, send an e-mail (afhh@afhh.org) or fax (202-543-4466) with "Subscribe" or "Unsubscribe" in the subject line. If you received this issue of the Alliance Alert via fax, please send us your e-mail address for faster delivery and to conserve resources. Thank you!