Content

 

About Building Blocks

 

Search

 

Building Awareness and Public Support

Building Capacity for Lead Safety

Collaborations, Partnerships, and Incentives

Financing and Subsidies

Lead Safety and Healthy Homes Standards

Targeting High Risk Homes

Using Code Enforcement and Other Systems

 

 

Appendices

 

 

Building Blocks Full Text [PDF]

 

 

CDC-Funded Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs

 

 

Produced by the Alliance for Healthy Homes and the Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 

 

 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 


Acknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Building Blocks | Search Building Blocks for Primary Prevention

Building Awareness and Public Support

 

Publicize Problem Rental Property Owners

 

Click here for PDF version or MS Word version

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE STRATEGY

Communities can improve local housing conditions and advance lead poisoning prevention and healthy homes by publicizing “problem landlords” in local media. Publicly drawing attention to repeat violators works to hold property owners accountable, facilitate prosecution of offenders, and deter future offenders. Simultaneously, this strategy increases awareness of the dangers of code violations, builds public and political support for code enforcement, and creates a common cause through which citizens and elected officials can work together.   

 

BENEFITS

Immediate/Direct Results:  Owners of substandard housing may be embarrassed by public exposure. Such publicity may serve as deterrence to other landlords, reinforcing the need for improved maintenance. Code inspectors may be empowered and political will increased for stronger enforcement.

 

Public Health Benefits:  As pressure mounts for owners to fix up their properties and repair lead hazards, occupants’ risk of exposure to lead will be reduced. Code violations that can lead to other health and housing problems (e.g. mold, rodents, and cockroaches) may be addressed as landlords seek to restore their reputation and public image. In the meantime, potential tenants will avoid these properties and protect their children from risk of exposure.

 

Other Indirect/Collateral Benefits: Landlords who have not taken code enforcement seriously may be convinced to be more vigilant in addressing problems and performing preventive maintenance. Current tenants in those dwellings may receive assistance not forthcoming prior to the public release of code violation information. Potential tenants will be warned away from properties owned by persons and entities with an established record for code violations including lead-based paint hazards.

 

Scope of Potential Impact

City - or - County - Wide

Neighborhood/Community

 

PRIMARY ACTOR(S)
KEY PARTNER(S)
Health Department
Code or Building Inspection Agency
Housing Agency
Mayors’ Offices
Tenants
Media

 

CRITICAL ELEMENTS

Staff requirements: This strategy can be implemented using existing staff.

 

Other resource requirements: Accurate code violation data, updated on a regular basis, is a key resource.

 

Institutional capacity required:   No special institutional capacity will be required to implement this strategy.

 

Cost considerations: No added costs will be required for this strategy.

 

Timing issues: This strategy can be implemented at any time and should be easy to sustain.

 

Feasibility of Implementation:  High. This strategy should be relatively easy to implement.  

 

Potential Obstacles/Barriers

Some local real estate groups or rental property owners’ associations will attempt to discourage elected officials from publishing information that exposes problem landlords.  

 

Additional Resources

 

 

 

ILLUSTRATION OF STRATEGY IN PRACTICE

In September 2003, Indianapolis’ mayor unveiled a “Top 10” list of city property owners who have been serial code violators. The property owners on the initial list held title to 310 properties throughout the city. The mayor’s list, which is updated as needed, serves several purposes. It helps to distribute information on problem landlords, assisting tenants in avoiding structures that may contain dangerous code violations and health hazards while exposing slumlords to the local community. It also helps the city to hold property owners accountable and provides a tool for community leaders seeking to put pressure on property owners to remedy code violations and maintain their properties.

 

Jurisdiction or Target Area
Indianapolis, IN

 

Primary Actor

The Office of the Mayor


Staffing utilized

Less than one week of existing staff’s time was needed to compile the list.

 

Other resources utilized

The Indianapolis Star newspaper. 

 

Factors essential to implementation

The willingness of the Mayor’s Office to take on problem landlords, as well as the cooperation of The Indianapolis Star in publicizing the Top Ten list, have been essential to the implementation of this strategy.

 

Limitations/challenges/problems encountered

The main challenge in implementing this strategy was compiling information from city and county code inspectors to provide a comprehensive picture of the most serious serial code violators.

 

Magnitude of Impact/Potential Impact

The Top Ten problem landlords list reached 270,000 Indianapolis Star subscribers. The list continues to reach countless others through the city’s website.

 

Potential for Replication

The potential for replication is very high.

 

Contact for Specific Information
Bruce Baird
Administrator
Neighborhood Services Division
Department of Metropolitan Development
317-327-5617
bbaird@indygov.org

 

References for additional information
1. http://www.indygov.org/eGov/Mayor/home.htm - Office of Mayor Bart Peterson

 

Previous Building Block
Organize "Toxic Tours" for Policy Makers
Next Building Block
Publicize Restrictions on Unsafe Remodeling and Renovation