Content

 

About Building Blocks

 

Search

 

Building Awareness and Public Support

Building Capacity for Lead Safety

Collaborations, Partnerships, and Incentives

Financing and Subsidies

Lead Safety and Healthy Homes Standards

Targeting High Risk Homes

Using Code Enforcement and Other Systems

 

 

Appendices

 

 

Building Blocks Full Text [PDF]

 

 

CDC-Funded Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs

 

 

Produced by the Alliance for Healthy Homes and the Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 

 

 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 


Acknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Building Blocks | Search Building Blocks for Primary Prevention

Lead Safety and Healthy Homes Standards

 

Make Lead Hazards a Violation of the Housing or Health Code

 

Click here for PDF version or MS Word version

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE STRATEGY

In order to provide the clearest legal basis for code officials to confront lead hazards, local and state codes should state explicitly that deteriorated lead-based paint and dangerous levels of lead in dust and bare soil constitute violations of the housing or health code. Specifically referencing lead hazards in the housing or health code will alert enforcement officials and property owners alike that such hazards constitute code violations and must be corrected. The code can explicitly incorporate EPA’s national standard for dangerous levels of lead in paint, dust, and soil that state and local jurisdictions can reference.   

 

BENEFITS

Immediate/Direct Results:  Enforcement officials have the authority to mandate repair or abatement and cite property owners who fail to comply.

 

Public Health Benefits:  Children are protected from exposure because hazards are addressed on a pre-emptive basis.

 

Other Indirect/Collateral Benefits: With the prospect of enforcement and fines, some property owners may be motivated to repair their property before problems occur.

 

Scope of Potential Impact

Statewide

City - or - County - Wide

 

PRIMARY ACTOR(S)
KEY PARTNER(S)
Inspection, Code, or Building Agency
State or local legislators

 

CRITICAL ELEMENTS

Staff requirements: Since adding lead hazards supplements existing code enforcement programs’ authority, no additional staffing would be needed.

 

Other resource requirements:

 

Institutional capacity required:   The initial requirement is local or state legislation that names deteriorated lead-based paint and dangerous levels of lead in dust and bare soil as code violations. Implementation requires training for code staff in the identification of lead hazards and certification to become lead sampling technicians, lead-based paint inspectors, or risk assessors.

 

Cost considerations: None identified.

 

Timing issues: None.

 

Feasibility of Implementation:  High. Adding lead hazards to the housing code is not difficult to implement.  

 

Potential Obstacles/Barriers

The strategy has limited usefulness if local jurisdictions do not have the budget or staff to investigate and enforce violations.  

 

Additional Resources

1.

EPA Section 403, 15 U.S.C. 2683 (40 CFR 745)

 

 

 

ILLUSTRATION OF STRATEGY IN PRACTICE

The Town of Manchester’s Property Maintenance Code requires that interior and exterior lead-based paint must either be maintained in a condition free from peeling, chipping, and flaking or be removed or covered in an appropriate manner. Cases involving lead-based paint violations are referred to the health and building departments to pursue compliance with state and federal regulations. If a child under six years of age resides in a property with deteriorated, flaking, or loose paint conditions, dust wipe samples are collected. If lab analysis results reveal lead hazards, repairs are ordered and the property owner is referred to the Lead Abatement Project, which may provide financial support to complete the repairs. Participants in the program are required to obtain lead safe work practices training.

 

Jurisdiction or Target Area
Manchester, CT

 

Primary Actor

Department of Health, Lead Abatement Project, in conjunction with the city’s Code Enforcement Unit


Staffing utilized

Only 0.2 FTE is available to address Property Maintenance Code complaints. One full time Property Maintenance Inspector, with support staff, would be needed to proactively address lead hazards in a town the size of Manchester.

 

Other resources utilized

 

 

Factors essential to implementation

Strong partnership with a childhood lead poisoning prevention program and enough staff to implement property maintenance code.

 

Limitations/challenges/problems encountered

Generally, Code Department personnel focus primarily on new construction and only react to property maintenance complaints, so there is a need for on-going education and advocacy about lead hazards in older properties. Nonetheless, a partnership between the building inspectors and the Lead Abatement Project has made a difference.

 

Magnitude of Impact/Potential Impact

By making lead hazards part of the Property Maintenance Code, Manchester has institutionalized the importance of recognizing and addressing them. This is an essential step in eradicating lead poisoning, particularly in an area where 93 percent of the housing is at risk for lead hazards.

 

Potential for Replication

High. The housing code provision is not difficult to implement, but to reach its full potential impact, the jurisdiction should have sufficient resources for code inspection and enforcement.

 

Contact for Specific Information
Sue Heller
Administrator
Lead Abatement Project
860-647-3288
sue41@ci.manchester.ct.us
John Hogan
Chief Building Inspector
860-647-3052
John21@ci.manchester.ct.us

 

References for additional information
1. - Town of Manchester, Code of Ordinances, Property Maintenance Code §7-305.4 et seq.

 

Previous Building Block
Establish a Lead-Safe Housing Registry
Next Building Block
Notify All Residents in a Building Found to Contain Lead Hazards