Content

 

About Building Blocks

 

Search

 

Building Awareness and Public Support

Building Capacity for Lead Safety

Collaborations, Partnerships, and Incentives

Financing and Subsidies

Lead Safety and Healthy Homes Standards

Targeting High Risk Homes

Using Code Enforcement and Other Systems

 

 

Appendices

 

 

Building Blocks Full Text [PDF]

 

 

CDC-Funded Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs

 

 

Produced by the Alliance for Healthy Homes and the Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 

 

 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 


Acknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Building Blocks | Search Building Blocks for Primary Prevention

Using Code Enforcement and Other Systems

 

Enable Tenants and Community-Based Organizations to Take Action to Address Substandard Housing Conditions

 

Click here for PDF version or MS Word version

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE STRATEGY

In many cases, tenants lack the ability to address substandard housing conditions or are reluctant to exercise their rights out of concern that the landlord will retaliate. Empowering tenants to take action when housing conditions are inadequate and enabling neighborhood organizations to act on tenants’ behalf can significantly enhance the efforts of code enforcement officials. One effective strategy is to legally enable tenants or their advocates to request a code inspection and empower them to pursue enforcement actions themselves in court. This approach also helps circumvent the common problem of inadequate resources for enforcement.   

 

BENEFITS

Immediate/Direct Results:  Tenants in substandard properties obtain legal standing to initiate code inspections, enforcement, and remediation actions without fear of landlord retaliation. If receiverships (court appointment of third party administrators to manage properties and oversee repairs) or rent escrow arrangements are permitted, rents can be used directly to fund repairs.

 

Public Health Benefits:  High-risk housing is targeted for repairs that reduce health hazards. Code agency and/or court oversight can ensure that repairs are done safely and following accepted protocols and without hazards being left behind.

 

Other Indirect/Collateral Benefits: Tenants gain power in relation to landlords, which could result in landlords community-wide becoming more responsive and proactive regarding maintenance and repairs.

 

Scope of Potential Impact

City - or - County - Wide

Neighborhood/Community

Specific (Targeted) Population

 

PRIMARY ACTOR(S)
KEY PARTNER(S)
Community-based Organizations
Code or Building Inspection Agency
Housing Agency
Local Prosecutors
Property Owners
Tenants
Contractors
Painters

 

CRITICAL ELEMENTS

Staff requirements: An experienced organizer could, in several months, organize a campaign capable of enacting such a law. One or more FTE (organizers, attorneys) could staff a project to assist tenants with using the process in just one community. Enacting a new state or municipal law to give legal standing for tenants in substandard properties to initiate code inspections/enforcement and take enforcement actions themselves can be a major undertaking.

 

Other resource requirements: Research would be needed on existing laws, as well as on the degree and extent of substandard housing conditions in the jurisdiction and specific shortcomings of the existing code enforcement system.

 

Institutional capacity required:   An organization undertaking such a campaign would need the capacity to organize and lobby, experienced staff, and relationships with allies among tenants’ rights, affordable housing, public interest, legal, and other community organizations.

 

Cost considerations: The positive impact on housing affordability and condition is potentially great. These benefits will far exceed the cost of a campaign to secure enabling legislation. Creating and funding an organization or agency to provide ongoing assistance to tenants bringing enforcement cases should be considered, as this will greatly improve the impact of the law and the quality of outcomes.

 

Timing issues: None.

 

Feasibility of Implementation:  Variable. Any organization undertaking such an effort should understand that because of the complex and unpredictable nature of the legislative process, the degree of difficulty may be greater than expected and success is not guaranteed. Pilot programs with limited scope may be a useful first step, giving advocates time and resources to prove that the strategy is effective in a target area.  

 

Potential Obstacles/Barriers

This strategy requires enacting new legislation, working to ensure that it is effectively implemented, and ongoing work to assist tenants with using the process. Thus, this strategy is a major undertaking and could fail if sufficient resources and energy are not available to overcome inertia and political opposition.  

 

Additional Resources

 

 

 

ILLUSTRATION OF STRATEGY IN PRACTICE

Minnesota’s landlord-tenant law, Chapter 504B, allows tenants, a municipality, or a neighborhood housing-related organization legal standing to bring a court action against a landlord who fails within a reasonable time to correct deficiencies at their property. Project 504, a non-profit neighborhood organization, has brought more than ten such cases in the past three years, leading to broad remedies for tenants, including in some cases the appointment of a third-party administrator to manage and operate the landlord’s property. Project 504’s court action also established precedent that significant unabated lead hazards in a property constitute an emergency, causing the court to issue orders to the landlord to correct the hazards immediately.

 

Jurisdiction or Target Area
Minneapolis, MN

 

Primary Actor

Project 504


Staffing utilized

Part-time involvement of a legal services attorney and a social worker/organizer.

 

Other resources utilized

Digital and video cameras, resources for meeting support, cell phones. 

 

Factors essential to implementation

Strong partnership with other affordable housing and tenant advocacy organizations. Code enforcement officials who recognize that the strategy’s success will reduce enforcement time spent on problematic properties. Strong and ongoing relationships with tenants, including any identified tenant leaders who will advance the strategy. Solid knowledge of landlord-tenant law, or partnership with pro bono or legal services attorney who can provide legal analysis and support. Relationships with proactive landlords who recognize the need to address substandard housing in their jurisdiction are also helpful.

 

Limitations/challenges/problems encountered

Language barriers should be expected and budgeted for in non-English speaking communities. Some code enforcers may view this strategy as infringing on their traditional role and turf. Strong initial negative reaction from some landlords should be expected, possibly followed by retaliation against the project or some tenants upon implementation.

 

Magnitude of Impact/Potential Impact

More than 200 families have directly benefited since 1999, with 200 additional units/families benefiting from the strategy’s incidental effects on neighboring properties. Project 504’s example has prompted the City of Minneapolis to pursue a similar strategy, leading to the filing of nearly 200 city-initiated cases since 2001.

 

Potential for Replication

Moderate.

 

Contact for Specific Information
Gregory Luce
Co-Director
612-221-3947
gluce@project504.org

 

References for additional information
1. http://www.project504.org - Project 504
2. http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/504B/395.html - Minn. Stat. § 504B.39

 

Previous Building Block
Create a Special Lead Court
Next Building Block
Equip Code Officials to Identify Lead Hazards and Pursue Enforcement