Content

 

About Building Blocks

 

Search

 

Building Awareness and Public Support

Building Capacity for Lead Safety

Collaborations, Partnerships, and Incentives

Financing and Subsidies

Lead Safety and Healthy Homes Standards

Targeting High Risk Homes

Using Code Enforcement and Other Systems

 

 

Appendices

 

 

Building Blocks Full Text [PDF]

 

 

CDC-Funded Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs

 

 

Produced by the Alliance for Healthy Homes and the Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 

 

 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 


Acknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Building Blocks | Search Building Blocks for Primary Prevention

Building Awareness and Public Support

 

Create a "Demonstration Home" to Educate Policy Makers and the Public

 

Click here for PDF version or MS Word version

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE STRATEGY

Just as homebuilders use model units to give a prospective buyer a vivid sense of the home they might purchase, lead poisoning prevention advocates can create “demonstration homes” to show how lead paint hazards can develop and demonstrate techniques for controlling lead hazards, as well as highlighting other healthy homes problems and solutions in a powerful way. The demonstration home can include hands-on, interactive components to provide a wide range of important and practical facts about lead poisoning prevention. Advocates can partner with key stakeholders to create and operate the demonstration home and invite policy makers and opinion leaders to tour the home, opening doors for further collaborations and discussions about needed policy changes.   

 

BENEFITS

Immediate/Direct Results:  This activity immediately provides practical education about lead hazards and lead safety to all who participate in its development, as well as to those who visit the home. It demonstrates to trades people and policy makers alike that many techniques for identifying and reducing lead paint hazards are simple and affordable, and provides an opportunity to explore the nuances of what interventions are appropriate for various circumstances.

 

Public Health Benefits:  This demonstration vividly teaches policy makers that lead safety can be achieved in many cases through interventions that are lower cost than typically believed. It also dramatically illustrates why lead-safe work practices and lead dust clearance testing are vital—and realistic—activities when old paint is disturbed.

 

Other Indirect/Collateral Benefits: By working together to create and operate the demonstration home, key stakeholders (such as tenant groups, homebuyers, affordable housing advocates, health care providers, hardware and paint stores, unions, building trades people, and do-it-yourself remodelers) build a foundation for deeper collaborations on lead poisoning prevention.

 

Scope of Potential Impact

City - or - County - Wide

Neighborhood/Community

 

PRIMARY ACTOR(S)
KEY PARTNER(S)
Health Department
Community-based Organizations
Housing Agency
Code or Building Inspection Agency
Utilities
Contractors
Tenants
Human Services Agency
Parents
Property Owners
Painters
Homeowners
Child Welfare Agency
Retail Stores

 

CRITICAL ELEMENTS

Staff requirements: Depend upon the goals and features of the demonstration home. One half-time person working with other volunteers could create a basic version of this in 2-3 months. The schedule for visitors could be limited to specific dates and times to minimize staffing requirements.

 

Other resource requirements: Basic equipment and materials that might be helpful for demonstrating lead safety techniques include lead spot tests, lead dust testing supplies and materials, HEPA vac and other cleaning supplies, photo displays of “before and after” conditions, photos or other graphics documenting the process of hazard remediation using different approaches, and take-home materials.

 

Institutional capacity required:   People creating the demonstration home must be familiar with a wide range of lead safety techniques and interventions and know relevant laws that guide acceptable practices. Anyone engaging in hazard identification or remediation practices should have all required credentials.

 

Cost considerations: This can be a very cost-effective way to reach key audiences with practical information, generate press coverage, and influence policy. The dwelling unit, equipment, materials, labor, and other in-kind items can be solicited from local real estate or housing development organizations, hardware/home improvement stores, labs, and community groups. If successful, another institution (government agency, store, health clinic, etc.) might agree to assume responsibility for maintaining the demonstration home in the future.

 

Timing issues: In the northern United States, warmer months are best for creating the home and attracting visitors.

 

Feasibility of Implementation:  High. Partnerships with agencies and organizations that can play a constructive role are key for success.  

 

Potential Obstacles/Barriers

Finding an easily accessible home that can be used for a substantial period is the major challenge. The impact of the strategy depends on drawing policy makers and other visitors to the demonstration home.  

 

Additional Resources

 

 

 

ILLUSTRATION OF STRATEGY IN PRACTICE

In Spring 2003, the Get The Lead Out Project created a “lead lab” for two months in a vacant house that was built in 1894. The project documented extensive lead hazards and low-cost hazard control treatments, and then conducted tours and open houses for officials and others. Various “stations” in the house featured basic lead poisoning information, photos documenting creation of the lead lab house, lead-safe cleaning tools, lead-safe work practices brochures and materials, dust wipe sampling kits, and an XRF machine. Project members demonstrated a variety of window treatments to reduce lead hazards, ranging from well liners to window replacement. A portable blood lead analyzer allowed people to have their own blood lead levels checked. Visitors took a lead dust wipe sample in the house. Visiting the demonstration home motivated several state and local officials to engage with advocates in substantial ways on subsequent policy and program matters. Local residents, property owners, code enforcement officers, and city officials became more aware of the problems of lead hazards and options for addressing them.

 

Jurisdiction or Target Area
Rochester, NY

 

Primary Actor

Orchard Street Community Health Center’s Get The Lead Out Project


Staffing utilized

Coordinator documented approximately 0.6 FTE, supplemented by volunteer contractors, risk assessors, outreach, etc.

 

Other resources utilized

HEPA vacs, XRF analyzer, portable blood lead analyzer, dust sampling kits, cleaning tools/supplies, photos of conditions and hazard control procedures. Recommend photo and video documentation. 

 

Factors essential to implementation

Partnerships among local agencies, owners, neighborhood group.

 

Limitations/challenges/problems encountered

Short life span of project.

 

Magnitude of Impact/Potential Impact

About 100 visitors in one month. Entire project was done for very low cost. More visitors could have been drawn if demonstration home were to be maintained for a longer period.

 

Potential for Replication

High. The extent of the program depends on local partners and constraints.

 

Contact for Specific Information
Katrina Korfmacher
Community Outreach Coordinator
University of Rochester
585-273-4304
Katrina_Korfmacher@URMC.Rochester.edu

 

References for additional information

 

Previous Building Block
Analyze and Publicize Data to Facilitate Improved Policies
Next Building Block
Create and Use Multi-Stakeholder Assessments and Reports to Advocate for Prevention