[ Print Version ]

A bipartisan Congressional vision for federal policymaking to support decent housing was articulated in the Preamble to the Housing Act of 1949:

The Congress declares that the general welfare and security of the Nation and the health and living standards of its people require housing production and related community development sufficient to remedy the serious housing shortage, the elimination of substandard and other inadequate housing through the clearance of slums and blighted areas, and the realization as soon as feasible of the goal of a decent home and a suitable living environment for every American family, thus contributing to the development and redevelopment of communities and to the advancement of the growth, wealth, and security of the Nation.

These remarkable words prompted numerous housing and community development programs that have had varying results for the health and well-being of millions of families over the last half-century. Some initiatives had unintended consequences: urban renewal intended to clear blight backfired as “urban removal” disrupted intact communities; mortgage programs favoring new construction accelerated segregation by fueling white flight from cities; quality of life was hard to maintain consistently in high-density high-rise public housing. But the federal government’s housing and community development successes have been many: hundreds of thousands of homes have been rehabilitated and rendered lead-safe; millions of families have been protected from substandard conditions by subsidies that closed the gap between the cost of housing and what they can afford to pay; communities have been developed, preserved, strengthened, and revitalized; and the means to shape and manage local economies have been transferred from outsiders to residents.

Today, the federal government continues to impact the housing sector in significant ways.

Federal policy plays a strong role in home ownership:

  • The IRS exemption of home mortgage interest from federal taxes enables $150 billion in subsidies to all homeowners paying an interest-bearing mortgage for their home, regardless of income.
  • For first-time homebuyers, federal agencies and intermediaries guarantee mortgages, facilitate buyers’ low downpayments and closing costs, and provide a range of other services and incentives.
  • Procedures for home purchase settlements and truth in lending are the subject of significant federal oversight.

Some renters benefit from federal housing policies. 34 percent of renter households whose income is in the lowest fifth of all renters receive some form of housing assistance:

  • Rent subsidy payments to landlord through a Housing Choice Voucher
  • Residency in public housing
  • Residency in other housing receiving project-based rental assistance from programs such as Section 202 for elderly households and Section 8 and HOME Investment partnerships.

Numerous federal policies explicitly support access to a healthy home environment. Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 called for the federal government to “take a leadership role in building the infrastructure ... necessary to ensure that the national goal of eliminating lead-based paint hazards in housing can be achieved as expeditiously as possible.” This landmark law required federal agencies to develop and implement measures that are reducing exposure to lead hazards:

Comprehensive approaches to housing condition are covered by several national policies and other documents:

  • HUD’s Housing Quality Standards (HQS) apply to units that receive Housing Choice Vouchers and rent subsidies through programs such as HOME. The HQS have also been used as the standard for completion of rehab and construction work. The HQS specify requirements such as lead safety; sanitary condition (“free of vermin and rodent infestation”); properly vented heating systems; water supply that is free from contamination; and interior air quality (“free from dangerous levels of air pollution from carbon monoxide, sewer gas, fuel gas, dust, and other harmful pollutants”).
  • HUD’s Minimum Property Standards (MPS) apply to units constructed using funds from mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA); these standards incorporate model codes promulgated by national organizations.
  • The International Code Council (ICC) promulgates, on behalf of the Building Officials and Code Administrators International, the International Conference of Building Officials, and the Southern Building Code Congress International, a model regulatory system for the built environment. In addition to establishing consensus national standards for residential and commercial building codes, ICC has developed performance-based regulations for Property Maintenance.
  • CDC’s Housing Inspection manual (currently being revised) is designed to inform local and state health departments and code agencies of health-based standards for housing.

Established and emerging policies address specific issues of housing condition and comfort:

  • EPA’s Office of Indoor Air is working on developing a voluntary label for homebuilders to follow to ensure indoor air quality. These science-based standards are designed to integrate a feasible approach to IAQ into the design and value propositions for new home construction and marketing.
  • EPA and NIOSH have developed guidance for building owners and facility managers that has some applications for multi-family apartment buildings.
  • EPA has developed guidance on indoor air for homeowners.
  • The Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program and HHS’ Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program address energy efficiency and the affordability of adequate heat.
  • DOE and EPA’s Energy Star Program promotes the development and use of energy-efficient products and construction methods.